<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iTunes phone rumors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jasonmacemore.com/2005/06/29/itunes-phone-rumors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jasonmacemore.com/2005/06/29/itunes-phone-rumors/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
	
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kumm</title>
		<link>http://jasonmacemore.com/2005/06/29/itunes-phone-rumors/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kumm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2005 11:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonmacemore.com/?p=14#comment-23</guid>
		<description>The phone was designed and built about 6 months ago. The delayed release was due to business complications, not technology. The cell phone companies didn't want to lose their $5 ringtone sales and they wanted a big chunk of iTune sales. This according to several Slashdot articles a few months back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The phone was designed and built about 6 months ago. The delayed release was due to business complications, not technology. The cell phone companies didn&#8217;t want to lose their $5 ringtone sales and they wanted a big chunk of iTune sales. This according to several Slashdot articles a few months back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
